Scientific method step 6: Shroud of Turin Terms

Scientific method step 6 in the Shroud Context

The fallacy of the non sequitur. After weak hypotheses have been eliminated according to known facts and laws of nature, you hope that at least one remains. After a comprehensive study of the known facts, STURP members reported[1] that, "We really do not have a satisfactory, simple explanation for how the body image got on the cloth." Many writers who are supporting a religious/miraculous position take that statement to mean something like the following: "If science can not explain the observation, it must have had a miraculous origin." The Greeks recognized the fallacy of such an "argumentative leap" before 300 BC. The fact that science has not yet found an explanation proves nothing.

	What is the Shroud of Turin? The Shroud Described.
	How the images might have formed. Images on the Shroud of Turin.
	Hints from Edessa, 544 AD. Early Shroud of Turin History.
	How a medieval artisan caused Carbon 14 Dating Errors.
	Startling, Mysterious, Unexplained. The 3D Encoding of the Shroud.
	The Variegated Cloth. Fooled by the Shroud's Background Noise.
	The Art Connection. Christ Pantocrator and the Shroud of Turin.
	Was the Shroud of Turin Described? Voices from the Past
	Medical Perspective: Forensic Pathology of the Images
	The Second Face: From the Back of the Cloth
	Some say . . . Painted, Leonardo da Vinci, Jacques deMolay, Coins, etc.